A Series of Practical Messianic Living (halakhah)
Who is a Jew?
all quotations are taken from the Complete Jewish Bible, translation
by David H. Stern, Jewish New Testament Publications, Inc., unless otherwise
The material that we will be dealing with here originally appeared as one of my short answers on the web-forum series "Ask the Messianic Rabbi", located at http://www.Saltshakers.com. As part this series on Torah Observance, I have decided to develop the teaching a little further. During the course of this commentary I will be covering such topics as Messianic Gentiles, Messianic Jews, Jewish lineage, Two-House theology, and finally the topic of conversions. Two bonus sections on "The Heresy of British Israelism" as well as "Biblical Birthright" also appear after this commentary.
Who is a Jew?
I am of the persuasion that the TaNaKH and the New Covenant Scriptures give us our best glimpse into attempting to answer this age-old question. I expect that after presenting my arguments quite a few other rabbis might disagree with me, citing various rabbinical sources and such; quite a few Christians might also disagree, citing such-and-such council and such-and-such document. But this rabbi still stands on the unchanging, unbiased, error-free Word of HaShem as the Final Authority–period. I don’t presume my lineage lists to be 100% comprehensive, rather, just the highlights. First lets tackle a seemingly easy question.
Who is a Messianic Gentile?
Messianic Gentile: A Simple Definition
It is generally understood that being Jewish means being a descendent of Avraham (Abraham), Yitz’chak (Isaac) and Ya’akov (Jacob) and it implies being a follower of Judaism and its practices. In another sense, it is applied to anyone who has joined himself to the people of Isra’el through ritual conversion, including circumcision for men. The term "Messianic" (i.e. "of Messiah or Christ") refers to anyone, Jew or Gentile, who has chosen to follow the Messiah Yeshua (Jesus). Scripturally, the term "Gentile' refers to someone who was born of non-Jewish parents and who did not identify himself with Isra’el through ritual conversion and circumcision. Thus, a "Messianic Gentile" could be applied to anyone who was born of non-Jewish parents and who is a follower of Yeshua.
Most Messianic Gentiles have chosen to worship the LORD in a setting that is largely devoid of any Jewish [culture], namely the traditional church. There is, however a small but growing group of Gentiles who have left the gentilized form of Christianity to join with their Jewish brothers who worship the Messiah of Isra’el in an original Jewish and Scriptural way. They have found that in returning to the Jewish roots of their faith they have achieved a deeper understanding and a more fulfilling expression of their faith. Many of these Gentiles live out their faith in a Jewish context, celebrating in their own homes the Jewish holidays as fulfilled by Yeshua. They often keep Biblical kashrut (Kosher laws) and other customs freely and without legalism, as a way to worship the LORD.
We see in the New Covenant that Messianic Gentiles have met every requirement to be accepted as full spiritual partners with their Jewish brethren in the messianic faith. "Do not lose sight of the fact that you were born 'Gentiles'..., utterstrangers to God's chosen community, Israel; and you had no knowledge of, or right to, the promised agreements [covenants] ... But now, through the blood of the Messiah, you are with us inside the circle of God's love ... (Eph. 2:11-13, Phillips). Furthermore, Acts 15:23-29 makes it clear that in order to become a child of God, a Gentile does not need to undergo conversion rites to Judaism. In fact, Rav Sha'ul (Paul) seems at times to take it one step further : Messianic Gentiles should remain as they are and not seek to become part of Isra’el in the flesh. (I Cor.7: 18-24). In reality he is not forbidding conversions, but rather forbidding unnecessary life changes in light of doing the more important work that Messiah has called us to do, namely enlarging his Kingdom. The operative word is "unnecessary".
In the Body of Messiah those who are Gentile participants in the Messianic Jewish faith are not second class citizens, but are equal partners with their Jewish brethren. As equal partners attending Jewish congregations, however, Gentile believers must share the vision of a culturally Jewish expression of faith and an outreach that reaches the Jew first, as well as the unsaved Gentile. After all, there is an abundance of places of worship where the faith is expressed in a culturally Gentile context. Those who are uncomfortable in a Messianic Jewish context can fellowship there.
In summary, although it is somewhat improper and inaccurate to claim a Jewish lineage if you are Gentiles, it is good to share how you too have come to faith because of your relationship with the Jewish Messiah Yeshua. When unbelieving Jewish people hear of your zealousness for the Jewishness of your faith, and your excitement over the Jewish Messiah, it can provoke them to jealousy. We trust that they will see that Yeshua is not the "Gentile god," but the "Redeemer of Isra’el."
Messianic Jew: A Not-So-Simple Definition
A simplistic definition with its roots in logic would suggest that a Messianic Jew is a Jewish person who believes that Yeshua is their Messiah. Some people think that a Jewish person who believes in Jesus is no longer a Jew. But what could possibly be more Jewish than believing in the Jewish Messiah Yeshua? No, the term "Jew" can tend to be a bit harder to define.
What does the term "Jew" mean to you? Maybe you have never even given it serious thought. For many people over the last two centuries or so it has often meant a "person of the Jewish race". This idea has its origins in ignorance and so-called "scientific racism". Unfortunately, the erroneous notion that Jews constitute a "race" is still believed by a significant number of people.
Even traditional Judaism understands that the term "Jewish" transcends both race and religion. It must of necessity include people born into Jewish heritage as well as sincere converts to that heritage. To suggest that there is a pure Jewish strain of untainted blood existing in the world today is to make an ignorant suggestion. The Torah and history have shown that the seed of Avraham has been scattered to the four winds, and have in fact intermingled with every society in which they were found.
Efrayim, Judah, and Converts
Again using basic logic here, one who converts to Judaism (any branch) is identified as a Jew. Some of my friends are former Gentile believers who have converted to Messianic Judaism, and now consider themselves Messianic Jews.
According to Two-House theology if you are born an Isra'elite (from one of the tribes other than Judah) then you are not really a "Jew" per se, but instead a "non-Jewish Isra'elite". In essence, a non-Judah-ite, is a physical child of Jacob, descended from one of the tribes of wandering and lost Efrayim, but a child of Jacob non the less. Confusing?
Let me state it another way. Well known author Eddie Chumney explains Judahites and Isra'elites quite succinctly.
In a personal email to me he explained:
"In order to establish a foundation for what the LORD has given me to share with you for the benefit and blessing of the entire body of Messiah, you need to understand that the term ISRA’EL was a name give to JACOB and NOT JUDAH. Jacob had 12 sons who each became head of the 12 tribes of Isra’el. So, ALL of Jacob's descendents are ISRA’ELITES.
"However, while Abraham was a HEBREW (which means 'one that crosses over') and Isaac was a HEBREW and Jacob was a HEBREW, it was JUDAH who was the first JEW in the Bible. The word JEW comes from the word JUDAH or YEHUDI in the Hebrew language.
"When God delivered the children of Isra’el from Egyptian bondage, He redeemed the physical descendents of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob who put the BLOOD on the doorposts and a MIXED MULTITUDE (Exodus 12:37-38). BOTH left Egypt along with the physical descendents of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob when they put the BLOOD of the Passover Lamb upon their doorposts. When they came to Mount Sinai, this "mixed multitude' of Exodus 12:37-38 AND the physical descendents of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were then named the 'house of Jacob' (Exodus 19:1-3).
"Later following the days of Solomon, the house of Jacob became divided into Northern Kingdom (house of Isra’el) and the Southern Kingdom (the house of Judah). The Northern Kingdom (house of Isra’el) are ISRA’ELITES but NOT JEWS. The Southern Kingdom (house of Judah) are JEWS AND ISRA’ELITES. Because of idolatry, the Northern Kingdom (house of Isra’el) was taken captive to Assyria. Because of idolatry, the Southern Kingdom (house of Judah) was taken captive to Babylon.
"The book of Hosea is written as a prophetic judgment and restoration upon the house of Isra’el (Northern Kingdom)."
(End of direct quote)
Some of those within the Church call themselves "Jews", without having undergone a formal conversion ceremony (known as "b’rit milah"). It is true that this ceremony is not necessary for receiving the free gift of salvation from Yeshua, but I’m not addressing the issue of salvation here. What I’m talking about is recognizing the identity of the natural-born Children of Avraham over and against the rest of the nations. Moreover, if indeed the non-Jews have made that identification, what are they doing about it? (Review Genesis 12:3 again)
Some in the Church call themselves a "new man", and that is a very good identifier. However, using the context of where that phrase is found in Ephesians chapter 2, this title would really include every single believing Jew, born and convert–i.e. us Messianic Jews–who name the name of Messiah Yeshua, also. So the naviy must be talking about a slightly different class of Jews in his prophecy. I purport that he is speaking chiefly of the natural, physical lineage of Avraham, who will one day become Messianic Jews, when they accept HaShem in full measure, by believing in his Son Yeshua. There is no distinction between a born Jew who trusts in Messiah and a convert Jew who believes the same–both are precious to HaShem! Yet, I believe the Torah is making this reference primarily for the sake of distinguishing those who, by choice, identify as physical descendents, against those who, again by choice, do not.
For one thing, if Two-House Theology is correct (and I believe that some of it is indeed Scriptural and sound) then most Christians according to Romans chapter 9:25, 26 might just well fit the description "those who were not my people", i.e., Lost Isra’elites! They just don’t know it. And if they do then corporately they are not professing it. What Two-House proponents must avoid teaching is the heresy known as British Israelism, which is a perverted form of the truth of the identity of God’s chosen people. British Israelism does not teach unity among Judah and Isra'el, rather, it teaches replacement of Judah with another, new Isra'el! Such heresy indeed! No wonder many well-meaning Christians avoid anything that speaks of Two-Houses. Education on the important differences between the genuine and the counterfeit will help to avoid the gross misunderstandings that correct Two-House Theology is attempting to present. More on the British Israelism heresy appears at the end of this commentary.
My concluding thoughts at this time on the Two-House movement:
(As originally appearing in an email dialogue that I had with Batya Wootten of ‘Who is Isra'el?’)
‘I have been and shall continue to be a seeker of the Truth. If the Two-House theology is just a case of good theology taught by poor teachers then God help me for rejecting truth simply because I don't like the messenger. I'm not one to simply dismiss something without putting up a good personal, theological, and Scriptural fight first. Two-House simply is not that easy to dismiss. Anyone who conducts an honest, serious, non-biased investigation for themselves will find this out. Maybe because the underlying thesis of Two-House teachings are based on a literal understanding of the promises of God made to Avraham and his offspring. Such promises are not meant to be so easily dismissed with a wave of the "allegorical" hand.
‘In my opinion a balance can be found between what Messianic Judaism teaches and what Two-Houses teach. The two are not mutually incompatible as some might suppose. It is indeed more or less a new twist on the age-old problem of trying to properly identify the physical offspring of Avraham (Who is a Jew?). Rabbis, laity, and secular folks have been pondering this question for quite some time now. Perhaps we shall have to wait for such a ministry to arise which is able to reconcile both views, or we shall have to wait until Yeshua comes to set the records straight. The real question, is after all, not whether or not you are Jewish, but whether or not you are righteous.
'In my estimation, a wise and careful Messianic Judaism would do well not to speak out so quickly against the Two-House teachings, but instead wait and carefully examine the fruits. After all, Scripture itself teaches us that only good trees produce good fruit. If this thing is from God then we can't fight it anyway; if it is from error then it will dry up and fade away some day anyway.’
As Messianic Jews in search of our identity we must also avoid teaching that Christians must be made to look like Y’hudahites. Truly there must also exist the Christians who did not come from either of the Two Houses but rather are genuine converts from the other nations. They are just as righteous if they are found in Messiah! Admittedly, the term "Isra'el" is the best term that can be applied to all who are found in Messiah for this identity alone is in complete accord with the B’rit Chadashah.
Indeed, many Christians do not wish to identify physically with Avraham, for they are satisfied in being counted as spiritual descendents. And what’s wrong with that? Nothing! For instance, no one was born a Christian, correct? All of us Christians became one by choice. But some of us were born Jewish (ritually circumcised on the eight day in accordance with the command), and some of us converted to become physical Jews (in accordance with the freedom granted to us in Messiah Yeshua). Are we Jews better off?
Not entirely (read Romans 3:1-9; 11:27-29).
However, if we blur the lines completely (i.e. an incorrect view of Galatians 3:28), at the expense of the redemption of Yeshua’s bloody sacrifice, then the literal promises given to the People of Isra’el listed in Ezekiel become non-effectual. Replacement theology and gross spiritualization of the Scriptures does damage to the literal promises of a holy, unchangeable God.
What about conversion?
Allow me to make another significant direct quote from a leading Messianic Jewish organization, one in which I feel some attachment to since I did my yeshiva training there. I’m referring to Messianic Bureau International (MBI). Messianic Rabbi David Hargis makes this information available to all at this site link (http://messianicbureau.org/). After reading their conversion paper I felt it was worthy to insert the information here in my commentary. While at this time I may not be in full support of Messianic Jewish conversions, I do in fact feel that MBI is breaking ground by pioneering into this difficult area of Jewish and Christian theology. I applaud their efforts even if I don’t applaud all of their methods:
‘The Jewish Conversion Process (Approved in principle by the 2nd Annual MBI Conference March 3, 2001)
[The Jewish Simcha is another way of referring to "Gentile conversion to Judaism". Simcha originally means celebration.]
The Messianic Jewish Simcha (conversion) is a controversial subject among Messianic Jews. This is because we are careful not to do anything to confuse or conflict with the simcha/celebration we have obtained in knowing Messiah Yeshua our L_RD. Knowing Him is the highest and best form of Judaism in our estimation.
Messianic Believers Want Conversion
However, we must recognize that many non-Jewish believers, who have come out of the Gentile world into the commonwealth of Israel through Messiah, feel and live much more as a Jew than a Gentile or even a Christian. They are surely no longer Gentiles in lifestyle or adherence. When Messianics do not have a way of obtaining Simcha, it sometimes results in a strong urge to adhere to Israel through a less than authentic means: either trying to get an orthodox conversion or accepting the Ephraimite doctrine as their claim to Israel.
All Messianics, whether from Jewish heritage or not, are unified as one new creation of G-d through their faith in Messiah Yeshua. This takes care of the spiritual connection, but there remains the need for many Messianic non-Jews to obtain people-hood in the earth. People-hood provides culture, which comes from a shared heritage, history, trouble and glory. Many non-Jewish Messianics feel closer to the Jewish culture than say their Irish, African, Hispanic, etc. roots. That should not be a surprise, since the Messianic Jewish restoration naturally promotes that sensibility. It does this by connecting the Ancient G-d of the Jews with His prophetic and revelatory work happening today.
Some Reasons for Jewish Conversion
These are some valid reasons for having a Messianic Jewish Simcha:
Messianic Judaism Wants to be a Valid Judaism
All other branches of Judaism provide for Gentile "conversion". Such seems to demand that Messianic Judaism must also provide for Gentile "conversion". If not, Messianic Judaism is called into question as a "true" or "valid" Judaism. Also, Messianic Jews normally accept Gentile conversions from other branches of Judaism. If Messianic Judaism does not have its own conversion process, then that means that Gentiles must go (and in fact are encouraged to go) to "non-believers" as the only path to becoming a Jew. Therefore in practice, other branches of Judaism seem to be more authentic or authoritative than Messianic Judaism. How is it that "non-believers" are considered more authoritative than believers? If conversions by other branches are "authentic" how is it that the Messianic Judaism branch does not perform such? Are we less "authentic" than the others? This perceived impotence by some may be one reason why Messianic Judaism cannot shake itself from being viewed by non-believing Jews as a mis-named sect of Christianity.
Yet, there are great difficulties with a Messianic Jewish Simcha that must be considered:
It may be possible for Messianic Judaism to develop a standard conversion process using these safeguards:
The Messianic Jewish Simcha requires a recognized and somewhat standardized process or "examination" period. Here are the requirements:
While this paper may be amended, it stands as the first principles regarding Jewish Conversion under Messianic Judaism, which has been adopted by Messianic Bureau International.
(End direct quote)
The Bible’s view of the term "Jew"
Who is a Jew? Let’s take a look now at a seemingly cryptic passage by one who professed to be a Hebrew of Hebrews, Rav Sha’ul (Apostle Paul). In writing to the believers in Rome he decided to address the issue of those who call themselves Jews (in Hebrew this would be "Yehudi"):
"2:17 Indeed you bear the name of a Yehudi, and rest on Torah, and boast about God,
2:18 and know his will, and approve the things that are excellent, being instructed from the Torah,
2:19 and are confident that you yourself are a guide of the blind, a light to those who are in darkness,
2:20 a corrector of the foolish, a teacher of babies, having in the law the form of knowledge and of the truth.
2:21 You therefore who teach another, don't you teach yourself? You who preach that a man shouldn't steal, do you steal?
2:22 You who say a man shouldn't commit adultery, do you commit adultery? You who abhor idols, do you rob temples?
2:23 You who boast in the Torah, through your disobedience of the Torah do you dishonor God?
2:24 For "the name of God is blasphemed among the Goyim because of you," just as it is written.
2:25 For circumcision indeed profits, if you are a doer of the Torah, but if you are a transgressor of the Torah, your circumcision has become uncircumcision.
2:26 If therefore the uncircumcised keep the requirements of the Torah, won't his uncircumcision be accounted as circumcision?
2:27 Won't the uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfills the Torah, judge you, who with the letter and circumcision are a transgressor of the Torah?
2:28 For he is not a Yehudi who is one outwardly, neither is that circumcision which is outward in the flesh;
2:29 but he is a Yehudi who is one inwardly, and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit not in the letter; whose praise is not from men, but from God."
(Romans 2:17-29, taken from the Online Complete Tanakh with Kitvei Talmidei HaMashiach)
I want to add some comments on these verses from David Stern’s ‘Jewish New Testament Commentary’ a little later, but for now let’s continue looking at the Biblical implications of the identity of those known as Jews.
Some of the Biblical implications, starting with the TaNaKH (Old Testament):
Now let’s examine some the New Covenant implications:
As you will notice, most of the qualifications of both lists repeat themselves, with a few very important differences. "Who is a Jew?" Based on this list the short answer might read like this: A Jew is anyone who willingly or decidedly falls into one or more of the categories from one list, the other list, or both combined. Being a Jew includes the subjective side of the issue: acknowledging one’s own Jewishness (as opposed to denying or ignoring it) privately and corporately. The Biblical heritage of Feasts and Festival and identity with the nation is critical. The modern thinker needs to remind himself that this is the way that HaShem sees them on this issue, regardless of where the Synagogue or the Church might disagree! God and the final authority of his Word define the truest definition of a Jew. There are physical Jews, and there are spiritual Jews! There are children born into the family and there are those who belong by "adoption"–both are legitimate heirs to the parental inheritance rights! The Torah says in the book of Ephesians that because of Messiah, we are no longer two separate men, rather, we are now one new man! This paradigm shift boggles the mind! Yet it still defines the answer to the question of who is a Jew. Some of the physical, natural-born Jews forfeit their Biblical right to be called as such. And HaShem knows who they are, even if we don’t. Likewise, every person who calls himself a spiritual Jew is not necessarily a genuine one either. To be sure, the Torah recognizes these "fakes" also.
A real Jew (physically or spiritually) is not necessarily a good Jew. "The full scope of being a loyal Jew includes involvement in the Jewish community and support for Isra’el. However, it means as well the preservation of the very historic-biblical roots of our heritage, which make these involvements possible… Not all will be able to fully give themselves to the whole of the Jewish heritage, but as loyal Jews, we do so the extent that we can in the Spirit’s leading" (Taken from Growing to Maturity, A Messianic Jewish Guide, Daniel C. Juster, 1982, 1985, 1987). Historically, when the Jews became disinterested, by faith, with HaShem, then he became equally disinterested with them. Covenants require a response on the part of the participants. HaShem has never reneged on his part of the agreement!
In closing let me quote from David Stern’s Jewish New Testament Commentary on the passage of Romans 2:28, 29:
‘Sha’ul was not a modern but a Pharisee who grew up in the home of Hebrew-speakers and had his mind steeped in rabbinic modes of thought at the feet of Rabban Gamli’el (Ac 22:3, 23:6; Pp 3:5).
‘Carrying many new ideas in his head, Sha’ul could produce a sentence that had both a simple sense (p’shat) and a hint (remez) of something more profound; furthermore, he would not be averse to making an allegorical or homiletical application (drash) of his own words or looking in them for a secret meaning (sod); because these four ways of interpreting texts were well known among educated Jews and were part of Sha’ul’s thinking equipment…
‘Thus a born-again Gentile, one who has come to faith in the God of Isra'el through trusting Yeshua the Messiah, is indeed a Jew inwardly; his heart is circumcised even though his flesh is not; he is a true God-praiser, whose praise comes from God and not from other people–in many senses a real Jew. In the present verse we find a hint (remez) of such ideas which Sha’ul will develop in the rest of Romans.
‘Elements of drash are present in the implicit challenge and exhortation to Jews who make a show of their Jewishness to change their ways and repent, and not risk being overtaken or even replaced by Gentiles (compare 11:11-25).
‘One can perceive a sod (secret truth), in that Yeshua, the Son of God identifying with all mankind by his atoning death, overthrows human categories by divine intervention.
‘But the simple sense of the text, the p‘shat, the meaning arrived at by linguistic and historical analysis, even though in some senses less profound than the other levels which rest upon it, is that the only real Jew is the born Jew who has been born again by trusting in Yeshua the Messiah, for only he lives up to what the name "Jew," conferred on him at birth and confirmed by physical circumcision, implies and demands.’ (pp. 339-340)
***BONUS MATERIAL (p.1)***
The Heresy of British Israelism
Lacking any biblical or historical proof for their doctrine, supporters of British Israelism have produced maps describing fictitious migrations of the "ten" Isra’elite tribes from the Babylon area across Europe to England. They also have tried to connect Queen Victoria with the House of David, saying that the English coronation stone is the stone Jacob slept on at Bethel (Gen. 28:11), but the English stone is a type of red sandstone which is not found anywhere near Bethel.
British Israelism has also concocted a peculiar kind of verbal evidence. It is argued that the word "British" is derived from two Hebrew words: (b'rith, meaning "covenant") and (ish, meaning, "man"). B'rith is pronounced "Brit" since the Hebrews never say a "th" sound. Thus, "Brit-ish" is said to come from the Hebrew for "covenant man" or "man of the covenant."
The Hebrew words b'rith and ish simply translate as "covenant" and "man," not "covenant man," and certainly not "man of the covenant." If we were to translate it as a phrase, the closest we could get is "covenant of man." Connections between similar sounding words in Hebrew and English are not supported by The Oxford Dictionary, Webster's Dictionary, or any other study of English word derivatives (etymology), for the two languages are linguistically unrelated.
British Israelism originated in the mid-1600s as a political argument to persuade Oliver Cromwell to allow the Jews to return to England. Appealing to Cromwell's British pride and nationalism, influential patrons convinced him that the Jews represented the southern tribe of Judah, and Anglo-Saxons were descended from the ten northern tribes, which were said to have been scattered and "lost" after being conquered by Assyria in 722 BC. These two groups (the Northern and Southern Kingdoms)-God's Chosen People-should work together until the Throne of England would rule the world with the help of the Jews.
By the end of the 19th century, British Israelism claimed two million supporters-mostly Church of England members. In the 20th century, Herbert W. Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God preached these doctrines. He identified the tribe of Efrayim (Ephraim) with Great Britain, M’nasheh (Manasseh) with the United States, the other Isra’elite tribes with various European nations, and Judah with the Jews.
Since Armstrong's death, the Anglo-Isra’el teaching has been repudiated by his church, along with most of his other heresies. A November 1995 Worldwide Church of God study paper, "United States and Britain in Prophecy," reported that Anglo-Isra’elite literature depends on "folklore, legends, quasi-historical genealogies, and dubious etymologies." It went on to say there is no recorded eyewitness to any Isra’elite tribal migrations across Europe and that no medieval or ancient genealogies have ever linked the royal families of the British Isles with the Isra’elites.
British Israelism crosses denominational lines and has no official church organization. Some British Isra’elite groups go so far as to say God's chosen race, the "true Isra’el," includes only white Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, and kindred peoples. Adam is said to be the father of the white race only, and whites alone have the divinely implanted spirit. All nonwhite peoples are excluded from the redemptive work of Messiah. Jews are a "race of vipers," "Satan's seed," "Christ killers," and persecutors of God's "true Isra’el." These ideas have been adopted by the so-called Christian Identity Movement and Revival Centre International, and other extreme conservative religious organizations, as well as extreme right-wing political groups and survival groups, such as the Ku Klux Klan.
Other organizations sharing these beliefs include the American Nazi Party, Aryan Nation, National Association for the Advancement of White People, and many more.
Not all British Israelism supporters endorse these anti-Semitic extremes. But racist ideas are easily derived from British Israelism because it demotes the Jews and exalts Anglo-Saxons as "true Isra’el." Racist groups do not hesitate to rewrite history, mistranslate words, and ignore Paul's warning: "Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: . . ." (1 Tim. 1:4; see also Titus 3:9).
***BONUS MATERIAL (p.2)***
Biblical Definition of "Birthright"
What is "birthright" by a biblical definition? And, in what way is inheritance different between the children of the same parents? We find the answer in the book of Deuteronomy:
"But he shall acknowledge the son of the unloved wife as the firstborn by giving him a double portion of all that he has, for he is the beginning of his strength; the right of the firstborn is his. (Deuteronomy 21:17, NKJV; emphasis added)
It is that simple. All of the children share the inheritance there is, but the firstborn gets a portion twice as big as the others. All inherit, but the firstborn gets a "better" portion, that is, a double portion.
There is even a spiritual Inheritance for God's firstborn, but that is something for another study. Right here, we are talking about a physical inheritance, and that is mostly about land. The firstborn gets a portion (of land) which is twice as big in size as the other children.
We know how Ya’akov (Jacob) deceived his brother ‘Esav (Esau) and then, helped by his mother, even his father Isaac, to get ‘Esav's birthright (‘Esav's double share). Even the name Ya`akov means "supplanter" (Genesis 27:36), or also, literally, "the one who holds the heel" (Genesis 25:26).
Then, among the sons of Ya’akov, it was Re’uven who was the firstborn. He was due to get the birthright (firstborn's) portion which was twice as big as the his brothers' portions, but:
"Now the sons of Ruben the firstborn of Isra’el–he was indeed the firstborn, but because he defiled his father's bed, his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph, the son of Isra’el, so that the genealogy is not listed according to the birthright." (1 Chronicles 5:1, NKJV)
Even there the birthright went to another person because of the immoral character of the one in line to receive it. These things were recorded as warnings for us. Later, the dying Ya’akov also made some arrangements:
"And Joseph took them both, Ephraim with his right hand toward Isra’el's left hand, and Manasseh with his left hand toward Isra’el's right hand, and brought them near him. Then Isra’el stretched out his right hand and laid it on Ephraim's head, who was the younger, and his left hand on Manasseh's head, guiding his hands knowingly, for Manasseh was the firstborn." (Genesis 48:13, NKJV)
Now, this did not affect the matter of the right of the firstborn when it came to inheritance after Ya’akov. That (double lot) was given to Yosef, and since Yosef's sons Efrayim and M’nasheh shared his double lot, that meant that they only received a single lot each, that is, as much as the other sons of Ya’akov.
What the above passage describes Ya’akov doing was only that he gave his special personal blessing to those two sons of Yosef, Efrayim and M’nasheh. That did not affect the inheritance. Sharing Yosef's double lot, Efrayim and M’nasheh received only a single lot each, not more than the other sons of Ya’akov.
But what was that blessing? What was it all about? Ya’akov explained the nature of that blessing:
"And Joseph said to his father, Not so, my father! For this one is the first born; put your right hand on his head. And his father refused and said, I know, my son, I know. He also shall be a people, and he shall become great. But his younger brother shall become greater than he, and his seed shall become the fullness of the nations. And he blessed them in that day, saying, In you shall Isra’el bless, saying, May God make you like Ephraim and like Manasseh. And Isra’el said to Joseph, See, I am dying; and God will be with you, and will return you to the land of your fathers. And I will give to you one spur of land beyond your brothers, which I took from the hand of the Amorite with my sword and with my bow." (Genesis 48:18-22, Green's Literal; emphasis added)
M’nasheh was to be a nation, and become great, and Efrayim was to become the "fullness of nations". (So is the Hebrew, fullness, not "multitude" as some translations have it.) What is meant by that "fullness"? Perhaps that the dying Ya’akov felt satisfied with his family. The explanation of the meaning of the word "fullness" (melo') may lie therein: Ya’akov perhaps felt that now with those "added sons" (Yosef's sons which he adopted as his own), he had his dreams fulfilled: "a full house", so to say.
Efrayim made the number of nations to come out of Ya’akov "full". That is a possible explanation of that "fullness"; perhaps the most reasonable one.
The noun melo' (fullness et cetera) comes from the verb male' which means "to fill", "to be full"; in certain forms/combinations the verb male' means "to satisfy", "to fulfill", "to accomplish", "to complete", "to confirm".
The blessing Ya’akov "gave" to Yosef was this:
"By the God of your father who will help you, And by the Almighty who will bless you With blessings of heaven above, Blessings of the deep that lies beneath, Blessings of the breasts and of the womb. The blessings of your father Have excelled the blessings of my ancestors, Up to the utmost bound of the everlasting hills. They shall be on the head of Joseph, And on the crown of the head of him who was separate from his brothers." (Genesis 49:25, 26, NKJV)
That was about the LORD giving Yosef, through M’nasheh and Efrayim, many descendants and a good (portion of) land. A part of the land we know to be "the Promised Land". Despite what some preachers claim, there is no other "promised land" except the land of Canaan, right where the modern state of Isra’el is. (That is, on the physical level.)
Verse 25, "blessings of heaven above". That can be of two kinds: Rain in due season, combined with good weather, and then, possibly, even other kinds of blessings from the LORD in the Heavens.
"Blessings of the deep that lieth under" obviously refer to the sea and the lakes and the rivers, fountains and springs. They water and make fruitful the land given to Isra’el, and have even fish and other useful things.
The name M’nasheh (really, Menashsheh) referred to the LORD causing Yosef to forget his sorrows, but 'Efrayim meant "a double ash-heap". Yosef himself gave the explanation of that name: "The LORD has caused me to be fruitful in the land of my affliction". Now, ash can be a very good and fruitful fertilizer, helping plants to grow. That is obviously the meaning of the name 'Efrayim. And indeed, even Ya’akov prophesied that Efrayim (along with M’nasheh) would receive "blessings of the breasts, and of the womb", fruitfulness in that way, many descendants. And they did while they lived in the Promised Land, and even earlier; that is a historical fact.
But again, the "special" birthright of Yosef, what was it? Not more than this: "And I will give to you one spur of land beyond your brothers" (Genesis 48:22, Green's Literal). The word "beyond" means here "more than".
Again, the "special" right of the firstborn was simply a portion twice as big as what the other children receive. Here that double portion (of land) was given to Yosef's two sons, whom Ya’akov had adopted as his own, to be shared between them. And since they shared it between themselves, each of them individually received only as much as the other sons of Ya’akov did.
Again, the right of the firstborn:
"But he shall acknowledge the son of the unloved wife as the firstborn by giving him a double portion of all that he has, for he is the beginning of his strength; the right of the firstborn is his." (Deuteronomy 21:17, NKJV; emphasis added)
That is what there was: A portion twice as big as the other children. Also, the "honor" of having the firstborn "title" in a family.
Please notice that Efrayim was not made "firstborn" in Genesis 48, nor did he receive the birthright alone. It was Yosef who was made to be "the firstborn" in Re’uven's stead. Yosef's two sons had to share (divide) what Yosef received. Consequently, that meant only a single portion for each of them. Efrayim and M’nasheh were even blessed together, although Ya’akov placed his right hand on Efrayim and the left hand on M’nasheh. But that was the blessing, not the inheritance. Birthright was connected to the inheritance.
Yosef's birthright was simply a double portion of the Promised Land, twice as big as the other sons of Ya’akov were to receive. That birthright was given to Yosef, and as his sons M’nasheh and Efrayim had to divide that double portion, they did not receive any more than the others.
The same matter is stated in clear words of the Bible:
"Then Israel said to Joseph, "Behold, I am dying, but God will be with you and bring you back to the land of your fathers. "Moreover I have given to you one portion above your brothers, which I took from the hand of the Amorite with my sword and my bow." (Genesis 48:21, 22, NKJV; emphasis added)
It was all concerning the Promised Land, the one formerly called the land of Canaan. Not any other land, and no other things but land, as far as we are speaking of physical things here on earth.
Genesis 48:22: What was the blessing Yosef (his two sons together) was to receive? Good growth, both of descendants and crops of the ground (Genesis 49:25-26). That is what it was